CO2 Sensor vs. VOC Sensor: What’s the Difference?

The Foundational Divide: Measuring People vs. Measuring Pollutants

To begin our exploration into the world of air quality monitoring, we must first establish a clear conceptual boundary. Imagine walking into two different rooms. In the first, a small, windowless meeting room, ten people have been talking for an hour. The air feels stuffy, stale, and warm. In the second room, a freshly painted and newly furnished office, no one is present. The air has a sharp, distinct chemical smell. The discomfort you feel in each room originates from entirely different sources and, therefore, requires different tools to be measured.

The debate of CO₂ sensor vs. VOC sensor is, at its heart, about choosing the right tool to measure the “problem” in each of these rooms. One is a problem of biology, the other a problem of chemistry.

Understanding Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) as a Bio-Effluent

Carbon dioxide is a natural, colorless, odorless gas that is a fundamental part of our planet’s life cycle. We learn about it in elementary school science: plants absorb it, and animals, including humans, exhale it. Every time you breathe out, you release CO₂ into the environment. In an outdoor setting, with the vastness of the atmosphere, this exhaled CO₂ dissipates almost instantly, mixing with the baseline concentration of about 420 parts per million (ppm) as of 2025.

Indoors, the story changes. In an enclosed space like a building, the CO₂ we exhale accumulates. The only way to reduce its concentration is to replace the indoor air with fresh outdoor air. Because of this direct relationship, measuring the level of CO₂ indoors becomes an exceptionally elegant and accurate way to determine how “fresh” the air is.

A high CO₂ level does not mean the CO₂ itself is the primary danger—though at extremely high concentrations it can be (Du et al., 2020). Rather, it signifies that ventilation is poor. If CO₂ is building up, so are all the other things humans emit—odors, aerosols, viruses, and other bio-effluents. Therefore, a CO₂ sensor is fundamentally an occupancy and ventilation meter. It answers the question: “How much of the air in this room has been recently exhaled by people?”

Defining Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) as Chemical Pollutants

Now, let’s turn our attention to the second room—the one with the chemical smell. The source of this odor is not people, but materials. Volatile Organic Compounds, or VOCs, are a large and diverse group of carbon-based chemicals that easily evaporate into the air at room temperature. The term “volatile” refers to this tendency to become a gas.

Where do they come from? Think of that “new car smell” or the scent of a freshly painted wall. Those are VOCs. They are emitted, a process called off-gassing, from a vast array of manufactured products. Common sources include:

• Building materials: Paints, varnishes, sealants, adhesives, carpeting, vinyl flooring.
• Furnishings: Pressed-wood furniture (which can release formaldehyde), upholstery, mattresses.
• Cleaning and disinfecting agents: Air fresheners, chlorine bleach, detergents, solvent-based cleaners.
• Office equipment: Printers and copiers can emit ozone and other VOCs.
• Industrial processes: Solvents, degreasers, and chemical feedstocks used in manufacturing.

Unlike CO₂, which is a single, specific molecule, “VOCs” is a catch-all term for thousands of different chemicals. Some, like the compounds that give flowers their scent, are harmless. Others can be significant health concerns, ranging from irritants that cause headaches and nausea to more hazardous compounds regulated for their long-term health risks (Krol et al., 2014). A VOC sensor, therefore, is not measuring people; it is sniffing the air for this broad family of chemical contaminants. It answers the question: “Are there chemical gases in this room that shouldn’t be here?”

A Classroom Analogy: Counting People vs. Smelling Chemicals

To solidify this distinction, let’s use a simple analogy. Imagine you are a teacher responsible for a classroom. You have two main concerns for the students’ well-being: ensuring the room doesn’t get too stuffy and making sure there are no dangerous chemical spills.

To manage stuffiness, you could hire a person to stand at the door and count how many people are in the room and for how long. Based on this count, you could decide when to open a window. A CO₂ sensor is like this person. It “counts” the presence of people by measuring their collective breath, providing a clear metric for when ventilation is needed.

To watch for chemical spills, you could train a dog with a powerful sense of smell to sit in the corner. The dog can’t tell you if the spill is bleach, ammonia, or paint thinner, but it can bark loudly whenever it smells any strong, unusual chemical. A VOC sensor is like this watchdog. It alerts you to the presence of a wide range of chemical “smells,” signaling that something is amiss and requires investigation. You would not rely on the watchdog to tell you when to open a window due to stuffiness, nor would you rely on the door counter to alert you to a chemical spill. Each tool has its specific, non-interchangeable purpose.

A Deeper Look at Sensor Mechanics: How They Perceive the Invisible

Having established the conceptual difference between what CO₂ and VOC sensors measure, we can now explore the fascinating science of how they accomplish their tasks. The internal workings of these sensors are fundamentally different, which directly influences their accuracy, specificity, and ideal use cases. Just as a telescope and a microscope both use lenses but for vastly different purposes, these two sensor types employ distinct physical principles to “see” their target molecules.

The Science of CO₂ Sensors: Non-Dispersive Infrared (NDIR)

The gold standard for accurate carbon dioxide measurement is a technology called Non-Dispersive Infrared, or NDIR. Its operation is a beautiful application of physics and is remarkably robust. Let’s walk through the process step-by-step, as if we could shrink down and travel through the sensor itself.

1. The Light Source: Our journey begins at a small infrared (IR) lamp. This lamp generates a broad spectrum of infrared light, which is invisible to the human eye but has specific properties we can use for measurement.
2. The Sample Chamber: The IR light travels through a small tube or chamber that is open to the surrounding air. As air from the room diffuses into this chamber, it brings with it all its constituent gases, including nitrogen, oxygen, and, crucially, carbon dioxide.
3. The Principle of Absorption: Here is the key scientific principle. Different gas molecules absorb light at very specific wavelengths. The CO₂ molecule has a particular “appetite” for infrared light at a wavelength of 4.26 micrometers (μm). When the IR light from our lamp passes through the air in the sample chamber, the CO₂ molecules present will “soak up” or absorb the light at this specific wavelength. The more CO₂ molecules there are, the more light at 4.26 μm gets absorbed.
4. The Optical Filter: After passing through the sample chamber, the light beam reaches an optical filter. This filter is designed to block all wavelengths of light except for the 4.26 μm wavelength that CO₂ absorbs. It acts like a gatekeeper, only allowing the light we care about to pass through.
5. The Detector: Finally, the filtered light strikes an IR detector. This detector measures the intensity, or brightness, of the remaining light.

By comparing the initial intensity of the light emitted by the lamp to the final intensity measured by the detector, the sensor’s microprocessor can calculate precisely how much light was absorbed by the CO₂ molecules. This amount is directly proportional to the concentration of CO₂ in the air, which is then reported as a value in parts per million (ppm). Because this method targets a unique physical property of the CO₂ molecule, NDIR sensors are highly selective and are not fooled by the presence of other gases. This makes them exceptionally accurate and stable over long periods (Hodgkinson et al., 2013).

The Mechanics of VOC Sensors: Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (MOX)

VOC sensors operate on a completely different principle, one based on chemistry rather than physics. The most common type is the Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (MOX) sensor. Let’s imagine we are looking at the surface of this sensor under a powerful microscope.

1. The Sensing Surface: The heart of a MOX sensor is a tiny ceramic bead coated with a special metal oxide, often tin dioxide. This bead is heated by a minuscule internal coil to a high temperature, typically several hundred degrees Celsius.
2. Establishing a Baseline: In clean air, oxygen from the atmosphere adsorbs onto the hot surface of the metal oxide. This process traps electrons from the semiconductor material, creating a state of high electrical resistance. The sensor measures this resistance as its “clean air” baseline.
3. The Chemical Reaction: When a volatile organic compound (or another reducing gas like carbon monoxide) comes into contact with the heated sensor surface, it reacts with the adsorbed oxygen. This chemical reaction releases the trapped electrons back into the semiconductor material.
4. Measuring the Change: The release of these electrons causes a significant drop in the electrical resistance of the metal oxide layer. The sensor’s electronics continuously measure this resistance. The greater the concentration of VOCs in the air, the more reactions occur on the sensor surface, and the lower the resistance becomes.

The sensor’s firmware then translates this change in resistance into a VOC concentration, often reported as a Total VOC (TVOC) index, in parts per billion (ppb) or micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³).

The key takeaway here is that MOX sensors are generalists. The reaction on the sensor surface is not specific to one type of chemical. Hundreds of different VOCs can cause the resistance to drop, which is both a strength and a weakness. It’s a strength because it can detect a wide variety of potential contaminants with a single device. It’s a weakness because it cannot distinguish between the harmless VOC from an orange peel and the potentially harmful VOC from a solvent leak. It is, by design, a broad-spectrum chemical alarm.

A Comparative Glance at Sensor Technologies

Feature	NDIR CO₂ Sensor	MOX VOC Sensor
Measurement Principle	Physical (Infrared light absorption)	Chemical (Surface resistance change)
Target Gas(es)	Specifically Carbon Dioxide (CO₂)	A broad range of Volatile Organic Compounds
Specificity	Very High (Only detects CO₂)	Very Low (Detects hundreds of chemicals)
Typical Units	Parts Per Million (ppm)	Parts Per Billion (ppb) or TVOC Index
Primary Indication	Occupancy level and ventilation adequacy	Presence of chemical contaminants
Common Use Case	Demand-controlled ventilation, conference rooms	Detecting spills, off-gassing, industrial fumes
Cross-Sensitivity	Minimal	High (sensitive to alcohols, solvents, perfumes, etc.)

Making Sense of the Measurements: What the Data Signifies

A sensor’s reading is just a number; its true value lies in our ability to interpret it correctly. A reading of “1000” from a CO₂ sensor tells a very different story than a reading of “1000” from a VOC sensor. Understanding the context, scale, and meaning behind these numbers is essential for taking appropriate action, whether that involves adjusting a building’s ventilation system or investigating a potential chemical source.

CO₂ Levels (ppm): A Proxy for Ventilation Adequacy

When you look at a CO₂ monitor, you are essentially looking at a proxy for the percentage of air in the room that has been rebreathed. The unit, parts per million (ppm), means “parts of CO₂ per million parts of air.”

Let’s establish some benchmarks, which are widely accepted in building science and industrial hygiene (Persily & de Jonge, 2017).

• ~420 ppm: This is the approximate baseline concentration of CO₂ in outdoor air in 2025. A reading near this level indoors indicates excellent ventilation, with air quality nearly identical to the outside.
• < 800 ppm: This range is generally considered to represent very good indoor air quality with effective ventilation. In such an environment, occupant comfort and cognitive performance are typically high.
• 800 – 1,200 ppm: This is a moderate range. While not dangerous, it indicates that ventilation could be improved. Some studies suggest that cognitive function may begin to be subtly affected at the higher end of this range.
• > 1,200 ppm: This level suggests poor ventilation. The air is becoming stale, and the concentration of all human-generated bio-effluents is rising. ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) often uses CO₂ levels as a key metric in their ventilation standards.
• > 2,000 ppm: Complaints of drowsiness, headaches, and stuffiness become common. This is a clear sign that ventilation is inadequate for the number of people in the space.
• > 5,000 ppm: This is the occupational exposure limit for an 8-hour workday in many jurisdictions. Levels this high are rare in non-industrial buildings but indicate a significant ventilation failure.

Think of it this way: if a room with a single occupant reading 700 ppm suddenly has ten more people enter, the CO₂ level will begin to rise steadily. A CO₂ sensor allows a building’s HVAC system to “see” this change and respond by increasing the supply of fresh air, a process known as Demand-Controlled Ventilation (DCV). This is an intelligent way to save energy, as you only ventilate as much as needed based on the actual occupancy of the space.

VOC Levels (ppb or µg/m³): An Indicator of Chemical Pollution

Interpreting VOC readings is inherently more complex because “VOC” is not a single substance. The sensor provides a “Total VOC” (TVOC) reading, which is the combined concentration of all the different VOCs it can detect. This is like looking at the total weight of fruit in a basket without knowing if it’s full of lightweight strawberries or heavy watermelons.

The units are also different: often parts per billion (ppb) or micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m³). Because VOCs are often more potent than CO₂, they are measured in these smaller units. A reading of 500 ppb is much smaller than 500 ppm (in fact, it’s 1000 times smaller).

General guidelines for TVOC levels in indoor environments are:

• < 200 ppb (or < 250 µg/m³): Considered very low and typical of clean indoor air.
• 200 – 600 ppb (or 250 – 750 µg/m³): A moderate level. May be caused by the presence of new furniture, recent cleaning activities, or multiple occupants with perfumes/colognes. Generally not a cause for immediate alarm but warrants monitoring.
• 600 – 2,000 ppb (or 750 – 2500 µg/m³): An elevated level. This suggests a significant source of VOCs is present. Investigation to identify the source is recommended. Occupants may begin to experience irritation or headaches.
• > 2,000 ppb (or > 2500 µg/m³): A high level of contamination. The source should be identified and remediated as soon as possible. In an industrial setting, this could trigger an alarm for a potential solvent leak or process malfunction.

A key point of confusion is that human activity can also generate VOCs. Acetone can be present on the breath, and personal care products are major VOC sources. However, the primary and most reliable use of a VOC sensor is to detect non-human, chemical sources. A sudden spike in VOC levels in an unoccupied lab overnight is a clear signal of a problem, like a leaking chemical container. A reliable fixed VOC monitor is designed for exactly these scenarios, providing continuous oversight of process safety.

Sensor Reading Comparison: A Practical Scenario

Scenario	CO₂ Sensor Reading	Interpretation	VOC Sensor Reading	Interpretation	Corrective Action
Empty Office (Morning)	450 ppm	Excellent ventilation; air is fresh from overnight cycling.	150 ppb	Low background levels; no significant off-gassing.	None required. System is ready.
Busy Conference Room (Mid-meeting)	1,400 ppm	Poor ventilation for the high occupancy. Air is stale.	350 ppb	Slightly elevated from occupants’ bio-effluents/perfumes.	Increase fresh air supply (HVAC). Open a window if possible.
Janitor Cleans the Office (Evening)	500 ppm	Room is unoccupied; ventilation is good.	1,800 ppb (Spike)	High concentration of chemicals from cleaning products.	Increase ventilation to clear the fumes. Consider using low-VOC cleaners.
Chemical Lab (Unoccupied, Night)	480 ppm	No people present; air exchange is normal.	2,500 ppb (Alarm)	A significant, unexpected chemical release has occurred.	Trigger alarm, notify safety personnel, ventilate area remotely before entry.

Application in the Real World: Selecting the Right Instrument for the Task

The theoretical distinctions between CO₂ and VOC sensors become most meaningful when applied to practical decisions in specific environments. The choice is not about which sensor is “better” in an absolute sense, but which sensor is the correct diagnostic tool for the health and safety goals of a particular space. An instrument that is vital in a pharmaceutical cleanroom might be of little use in a school gymnasium, and vice-versa. The core question in the CO₂ sensor vs. VOC sensor dilemma is always: what am I trying to protect my people or processes from?

When to Prioritize a CO₂ Sensor: People-Centric Environments

A CO₂ sensor excels in environments where the primary source of air quality degradation is the occupants themselves. Its function is to monitor the direct byproduct of human metabolism to ensure spaces do not become stale and that the risk of airborne pathogen transmission is minimized through adequate dilution with fresh air.

Consider a modern office building. The space is filled with people working, meeting, and collaborating. The main air quality challenge is not typically from chemical off-gassing (assuming the building is not brand new), but from the accumulation of exhaled CO₂ and other bio-effluents.

Here, deploying NDIR CO₂ sensors in occupied zones and conference rooms is a highly effective strategy. These sensors can feed data directly to the Building Management System (BMS). When a meeting room fills up and CO₂ levels climb past 1,000 ppm, the BMS can automatically command the HVAC system to increase the flow of fresh air to that specific zone. When the room empties, the sensor reading drops, and the system throttles back the ventilation, saving significant energy costs.

This same logic applies to schools, theaters, lecture halls, and public transit. In all these cases, the goal is to manage air quality relative to the number of people present. A VOC sensor in these environments would likely create confusing data, spiking when someone wears strong perfume or when the floors are cleaned, but it would fail to provide the most relevant metric: a direct measure of how much fresh air each person is receiving.

When a VOC Sensor is Indispensable: Process and Material-Centric Environments

A VOC sensor becomes the primary tool in settings where the main threat to air quality comes from non-human chemical sources. These are environments where materials, processes, and stored chemicals are the dominant concern.

Let’s examine a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility or a chemical research laboratory. The air in these spaces may be subject to contamination from solvents, reagents, byproducts of chemical reactions, or sterilizing agents. A leak from a drum of isopropyl alcohol or a malfunction in a fume hood could release harmful VOCs into the work area. In this context, a CO₂ sensor would be useless; it would simply report low levels due to the typically low occupancy density in such large spaces.

A VOC sensor, however, acts as a crucial safety sentinel. It continuously “sniffs” the air for the chemical signatures of these compounds. A sudden spike in the TVOC reading would trigger an immediate alarm, alerting personnel to a potential leak or containment failure long before human senses could detect it or concentrations reach dangerous levels. For these critical safety applications, robust industrial gas analysis solutions are not just useful, they are often mandated by safety regulations.

Other environments where VOC sensors are critical include printing shops (solvents in inks), paint booths, furniture manufacturing plants (formaldehyde from pressed wood), and even museums or archives where the off-gassing from old materials could damage sensitive artifacts. In all these cases, the question being answered is “Is there a chemical contaminant present?”—a question only a VOC sensor can address.

The Synergy of Using Both: A Comprehensive Air Quality Strategy

In many modern, complex buildings, the choice is not an “either/or” proposition. The most robust and intelligent air quality monitoring strategy often involves using both types of sensors, deploying them where their strengths are most applicable.

Imagine a state-of-the-art research and development campus. The building contains:

1. High-density office spaces and collaboration hubs.
2. Research laboratories where various chemicals are used.
3. A cafeteria and fitness center.

A comprehensive strategy would deploy CO₂ sensors throughout the office spaces and common areas (cafeteria, gym). These sensors would manage the ventilation for occupant comfort, health, and energy efficiency. They would ensure that a crowded meeting doesn’t lead to stuffy air and post-lunch drowsiness.

Simultaneously, within the laboratory sections of the building, VOC sensors would be installed. These sensors would be networked into a separate safety alert system. Their purpose would be to provide early warning of any chemical spills, leaks from gas lines, or failures in ventilation hoods.

This dual-sensor approach creates a complete picture of indoor environmental quality. The CO₂ sensors manage the “known” variable of human occupancy, while the VOC sensors stand guard against the “unknown” variable of accidental chemical release. This allows for a system that is both energy-efficient in its day-to-day operation and uncompromising in its safety protocols. It recognizes that air quality is not a single problem but a multifaceted challenge requiring specialized tools for each aspect.

Advanced Nuances and Future Directions in Air Sensing

As our understanding of indoor environments deepens, the technology we use to monitor them also evolves. Moving beyond the basic CO₂ vs. VOC debate, we encounter more sophisticated concepts, practical challenges like maintenance, and exciting future trends that promise even greater insight into the air we breathe. Acknowledging these complexities is part of developing a truly expert approach to air quality management.

The Concept of eCO₂ (Equivalent CO₂)

In the marketplace for consumer air quality monitors, you may encounter a metric called “eCO₂” or “equivalent CO₂.” It is crucial to understand what this is—and what it is not. eCO₂ is not a direct measurement of carbon dioxide. Instead, it is an estimation of the CO₂ level that is calculated by a VOC sensor.

The logic behind it is based on an algorithm that observes changes in the TVOC level and assumes these changes are caused by the VOCs emitted by humans. The sensor’s programming tries to correlate a certain increase in VOCs with the likely increase in CO₂ that would happen if people were the source.

However, this method is fraught with potential inaccuracies. Consider these scenarios:

• False Positives: If you use an alcohol-based cleaning wipe near a sensor that calculates eCO₂, the sensor will register a massive spike in VOCs. The algorithm, assuming this must be from a huge crowd of people suddenly appearing, might report a dangerously high eCO₂ level of 5000 ppm, even if you are alone in a well-ventilated room.
• False Negatives: Conversely, in a crowded but very “clean” environment (no perfumes, no new materials), the VOC level might not change much, while the actual CO₂ level from respiration steadily climbs. The eCO₂ reading might remain deceptively low, failing to indicate the growing stuffiness of the room.

For any application where accuracy matters—such as controlling a ventilation system or making health-based decisions—eCO₂ is not a suitable substitute for a true measurement from an NDIR CO₂ sensor. While it may be an interesting feature in a low-cost home gadget, it lacks the reliability and specificity required for commercial, industrial, or scientific use. It is an estimation, not a measurement.

Sensor Calibration, Maintenance, and Lifespan

A sensor is only as good as its last calibration. Over time, all sensors can experience “drift,” where their readings become less accurate. The two technologies we have discussed have very different maintenance profiles.

NDIR CO₂ sensors are known for their long-term stability. Many high-quality NDIR sensors feature automatic baseline calibration (ABC) logic. The sensor’s software monitors its readings over a period of days or weeks and identifies the lowest reading. It assumes this lowest point corresponds to a time when the space was unoccupied and CO₂ levels were at the outdoor baseline (~420 ppm). It then adjusts its internal calibration to match this baseline. This self-calibration makes NDIR sensors very low-maintenance, often operating accurately for 10 years or more without manual intervention.

MOX VOC sensors, on the other hand, are more susceptible to drift and degradation. The high-temperature chemical reactions on the sensor surface can cause its sensitivity to change over time. Furthermore, exposure to certain chemicals (like silicones, often found in lubricants and sealants) can permanently “poison” the sensor, reducing its ability to detect other compounds.

For these reasons, MOX sensors may require more frequent verification or recalibration against a known concentration of a target gas (like isobutylene) to ensure their readings remain meaningful. Their operational lifespan is also generally shorter than that of NDIR sensors, often in the range of 5 to 7 years.

The Future of Air Sensing: Multi-Gas Platforms and AI Integration

The field of environmental sensing is advancing rapidly. The simple dichotomy of CO₂ vs. VOC is beginning to blur as new technologies emerge. The future points towards more integrated and intelligent systems.

One exciting development is the creation of more sophisticated VOC sensors. While most current MOX sensors provide a single TVOC value, new platforms are being developed that can begin to differentiate between different classes of VOCs. By using an array of different sensor materials or by modulating the sensor’s temperature, these devices can create a “fingerprint” for the air, potentially distinguishing between alcohols, aldehydes (like formaldehyde), and aromatic hydrocarbons.

Furthermore, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning is set to revolutionize how we interpret sensor data (Sarkar et al., 2022). An AI-powered building management system could learn the “normal” daily patterns of CO₂ and VOCs in a building. It could then intelligently identify anomalies. For example, it might learn that a small VOC spike at 2 PM on weekdays is normal (afternoon cleaning crew), but a large VOC spike at 3 AM on a Sunday is a critical anomaly that requires an immediate alert.

AI can help move us from simple threshold-based alarms to predictive and pattern-based air quality management, providing a richer, more contextual understanding of the indoor environment.

Related Products

The discourse surrounding the CO₂ sensor vs. VOC sensor is ultimately a lesson in the importance of asking the right question. Before selecting a tool, we must first define the problem we are trying to solve. Are we concerned with the stuffiness created by the presence of people, or are we standing guard against the intrusion of chemical contaminants?

A CO₂ sensor is our instrument for understanding the dynamics of occupancy and the effectiveness of our response—ventilation. A VOC sensor is our sentinel, our non-specific alarm for the presence of a broad range of chemical agents. One manages the known and predictable byproducts of life; the other watches for the unpredictable introduction of artificial substances. By grasping this fundamental distinction, we move beyond a simple comparison of technologies and toward a more profound and effective stewardship of the air in the spaces where we live and work.

More Resources

• 

  Blog

  5 Best Digital Mass Flow Controllers for Precision Gas Flow Measurement

    Finding the best digital mass flow controller is crucial for maintaining accuracy, efficiency, and reliability in critical applications. These sophisticated instruments have…

• 

  Installation & Maintenance

  Guide to Connecting a Thermal Mass Flow Controller to a PLC

  How to connect and use a Sino-Inst thermal gas mass flow controller and a PLC? The connection between a thermal gas mass flow…

• 

  General Understanding

  Expert Guide: How a Photoionization Detector Works

  A photoionization detector (PID) is a highly sensitive analytical instrument designed for the broad-spectrum detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and certain inorganic…

• 

  Selection Guide

  7 Critical Mistakes in Gas Sampling System Design: A Practical Checklist

  The integrity of a gas analysis process is fundamentally dependent on the quality of its gas sampling system. An improperly designed or maintained…

• 

  Buyer’s Guide

  Buyer’s Guide: 7 Critical Checks for Selecting a Chlorine Gas Detector

  Effective chlorine detection is an essential requirement in numerous industrial and municipal sectors, including water treatment plants, chemical plants, and pulp and paper…

• 

  Applications

  Proven Solutions for the 5 Critical Health Dangers of Ammonia Leaks

  Anhydrous ammonia (NH₃) is a cornerstone of modern industry, indispensable in agriculture, refrigeration, and chemical manufacturing. Its utility, however, is shadowed by significant…